I must have been asleep for the past few weeks because Angelina Jolie’s movie that I thought was about a woman falling in love with the man who raped her but seems to have a slightly different (though still pretty disconcerting) angle has come out to mixed reviews. Spoiler alert: “In the film, a Bosnian Muslim woman and a Serbian Christian man find their carefree date interrupted by the outbreak of the war. Cut to: a Serbian prison camp where Muslim women are held in sexual bondage. He is the jailor and she the captive. A relationship develops — ‘consensual’ is not the right word since Danijel’s offer to make Ajla ‘his’ mistress saves her from the systematic rape of his comrades…Ajla’s physical survival is connected to her ability to sexually please Danijel…His emotional survival is linked to Ajla’s perceived redeeming love for him.” Not exactly what I expected but still feeling pretty weird about it.
Yo are you forreal with this article? It’s not all bad but I’m definitely gonna need some bullet points for this one:
- “Haiti: Miserable, but it photographs well”
- “The West’s eternal basket case…”
- “The Haitians outdid the stereotypical Israeli in pushing, shoving and trampling.”
- “A few of them wanted very much to help me with my suitcase but when I aimed the camera at them, two of them pulled a finger across their throats in a gesture that seemed to need no translation.”
- “Photographers say that the suffering and misery in these areas photographs wonderfully.”
- “Poverty, ignorance, disease are rampant.”
- “Life has a different value here.”
- “The entire country looks like one big slum”
- “It is impossible to leave this beautiful, sad country without attending a voodoo ceremony.”
- “…a few young men and many old black women wearing colorful dresses and red ribbons in their hair, who looked as though they had been taken from a slavery history museum…”
On a brighter note, hat tip to the FT for the pun of the week. Congrats. I’m sure it means a lot to you guys.